Skip to main content
· 10/19/1976

Schuldes v. National Surety Corporation

Citations

  • 557 P.2d 543
  • 27 Ariz. App. 611
  • 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming summary judgment where \the damages sought in this suit do not have the requisite certainty of existence in order to allow their recovery\
  • “[N]o damages can be allowed for the loss of profits which is determined 12 to be uncertain, contingent, conjectural, or speculative.”
  • although a written response is required by Eule IV, and uncontested facts evidenced in the motion must be taken as true, the superior court still must determine whether the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
  • although a written response is required by Rule IV, and uncontested facts evidenced in the motion must be taken as true, the superior court still must determine whether the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eubank, Haire, Jacobson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.