Woerth v. City of Flagstaff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Flagstaff Personnel Board requires that the employer establish facts by a preponderance of the evidence
• holding a claim of undue hardship was insufficient where no specific supporting facts were presented by affidavit or testimony
• stating that court cannot properly consider “[u]nsworn and unproven assertions” in determining fee request
• concluding the ARA does not authorize an appeal from municipal personnel board decisions
• “[T]he only remedy available to [the plaintiff] to challenge the propriety of the [personnel board’s] decision is by special action.”
• “Generally, the party asserting a claim for relief has the burden of proving the facts essential to his claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).