Acevedo v. Burley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidentiary hearing is not required in judicial proceeding in absence of genuine issue of material fact
• noting that evidentiary hearing on motion to modify child support is unnecessary “where the moving party advances only ‘generalized allegations of factual issues’ that other record evidence convincingly refutes” (quoting Epperson v. Epperson, 835 P.2d 451, 453 n.4 (Alaska 1992)
• \For purposes of determining the standard of review ... we draw analogy to review of summary judgment decisions.... [W]e review the ... decision using our independent judgment.\
• reviewing denial without hearing of motion to modify child support
• analogizing this standard to our review of summary judgment decisions
• reviewing denial without hearing of motion to modify child support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).