Skip to main content

Lilly v. State

Citations

  • 365 S.W.3d 321
  • 2012 WL 1939751
  • 2012 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 571

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that reviewing courts look to the totality of the circumstances to determine whether a defendant’s trial was closed to the public
  • holding that because the appellant failed to provide substantive analysis or authority supporting his claim, his inadequate briefing relieved the court of addressing the claim
  • holding that issue related to failure to hold a public trial was preserved for review despite guilty plea and that judgment should be reversed and cause remanded for a new trial
  • holding that issue related to failure to hold a public trial was preserved for review despite guilty plea and that judgment should be reversed and cause remanded for a new trial
  • holding that issue related to failure to hold a public trial was preserved for review despite guilty plea and that judgment should be reversed and cause remanded for a new trial
  • holding that issue related to failure to hold a public trial was preserved for review despite guilty plea and that judgment should be reversed and cause remanded for a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hervey, Price, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Cochran, Alcala, Keller, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.