Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 1/11/2002

State v. Daniels

Citations

  • 40 P.3d 611
  • 2002 UT 2
  • 438 Utah Adv. Rep. 12
  • 2002 Utah LEXIS 4
  • 2002 WL 27622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e conclude that the practice challenged in this case was not inherently prejudicial[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Durrant, Howe, Russon, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

79 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.