Skip to main content

Merrick v. State

Citations

  • 567 S.W.3d 359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “This court has consistently held reversal is not required by exclusion of evidence where the same testimony was later admitted without objection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birdwell, Gabriel, Pittman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Merrick v. State

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.