Lidstrand v. Silvercrest Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where a mobile home’s one-year express warranty did not state it was limited to the original owner, the person who bought the defective mobile home from the original owner was not barred by privity from suing the remote manufacturer for breach of express warranty
• stating plaintiff buying a 26 defective mobile home from defendant corporation was a consumer transaction
• buyers of defective mobile home entitled to recover rental cost of alternative housing as consequential damages
• affirming award of repair costs to fix defective mobile home
• plaintiff purchased defective mobile home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).