Rakesh Maini Jasmail Mainivikram Maini Arjum Maini,petitioners v. Immigration and Naturalization Service,opinion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “personal conjecture and speculation . . . is no substitute for substantial evidence” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• concluding that physical attacks constituted persecution
• “Accordingly, we hold that the Mainis are ‘statutorily eligible for asylum.’ ”
• “We have said it before and we say it again: conjecture and speculation can never replace substantial evidence.”
• 'We have said it before and we say it again: conjecture and speculation can never replace substantial evidence.'
• “We have said it before and we say it again: conjecture and speculation can never replace substantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).