Felix Norbert Siewe v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “even ancillary evidence sometimes supports” the application of fal-sas in uno falsus in omnibus (false in one thing, false in everything)
• holding that a reviewing court defers to the 10 agency where there are two possible interpretations of the 11 record
• holding that speculation is not “bald” if based on facts in record viewed in light of common sense
• holding that “a single instance of false testimony may (if attributable to the petitioner) infect the balance of the [petitioner’s] uncorroborated or unauthenticated evidence”
• holding that “support for a contrary inference – even one more plausible or more natural – does not suggest error”
• holding that, where the 12 evidence could support multiple inferences, we defer to the IJ’s choice between 13 those inferences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).