Leyva v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To ‘pierce the corporate veil’ three factors must be proven: (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Houri v. Boaziz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-03-09· cited 9×
• Wilson v. Wilson Sr.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-02-15· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-10-18· cited 100×
• Kearse v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-06-22· cited 99×
• Parker v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-06-02· cited 93×
• Mansfield v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-07-07· cited 61×
• Hannon v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-08-31· cited 52×