Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 9/23/2020

Lexyington McIntyre v. Eugene School District 4j

Citations

  • 976 F.3d 902

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the inquiry does not turn on whether a complaint includes (or omits) any magic phrase, such as FAPE or IEP”
  • declining to decide the issue of whether a hostile work environment claim is actionable under the ADA, but noting that every other circuit court to address the issue has held such a claim is actionable
  • “McIntyre did not otherwise seek or receive special education—or, for that matter, an IEP”
  • “we remand for further consideration whether McIntyre’s claims are subject to minority tolling”
  • “comply[ing] with an emergency health protocol” is not special instruction.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.