Skip to main content
· 5/4/2012

HENRY A. v. Willden

Citations

  • 678 F.3d 991
  • 2012 WL 1561030
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 9150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the “special relationship doctrine applies to children in foster care”
  • addressing the low 6 standard applicable for granting leave to amend in circumstances analogous to this case
  • discussing with approval a complaint that listed “failure to adequately respond to 24 reports of abuse” as a violation of the “special relationship doctrine”
  • involving a claim of deliberate indifference by foster children against state defendants for exposing the children to danger
  • “[I]gnoring the instructions of a treating physician . . . can amount to 11 deliberate indifference . . . .”
  • finding allegation of supervisory liability 2 insufficient where complaint “does not allege . . . any personal knowledge of the specific constitutional 3 violations that led to Plaintiffs’ injuries”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Fletcher, Paez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.