· 6/13/2014
Reymundo Mendoza v. Thomas Perez
Citations
- 410 U.S. App. D.C. 210
- 754 F.3d 1002
- 2014 WL 2619844
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 11005
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that regulations that had “long existed” as to shepherds and goatherds re-started the limitation period when they were extended to reach cattle herders
- holding that a 12 plaintiff asserting injury to procedural rights need not prove that a different outcome would have 13 occurred if the procedure had been completed
- noting that a court may consider \relevant facts found outside of the complaint\ when evaluating a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of standing
- noting that a court may consider “relevant facts found outside of the complaint” when evaluating a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of standing
- “The clear intent of [section 1188(a)(1)] is to protect American workers from the deleterious effects the employment of foreign labor might have on domestic wages and working conditions.”
- “To establish jurisdiction, the court need only find one plaintiff who has standing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tatel, Brown, Millett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.