Skip to main content
· 6/13/2014

Reymundo Mendoza v. Thomas Perez

Citations

  • 410 U.S. App. D.C. 210
  • 754 F.3d 1002
  • 2014 WL 2619844
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 11005

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that regulations that had “long existed” as to shepherds and goatherds re-started the limitation period when they were extended to reach cattle herders
  • holding that a 12 plaintiff asserting injury to procedural rights need not prove that a different outcome would have 13 occurred if the procedure had been completed
  • noting that a court may consider \relevant facts found outside of the complaint\ when evaluating a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of standing
  • noting that a court may consider “relevant facts found outside of the complaint” when evaluating a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of standing
  • “The clear intent of [section 1188(a)(1)] is to protect American workers from the deleterious effects the employment of foreign labor might have on domestic wages and working conditions.”
  • “To establish jurisdiction, the court need only find one plaintiff who has standing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tatel, Brown, Millett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.