Supreme Court· 6/16/2014

Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus

Citations

134 S. Ct. 2334
189 L. Ed. 2d 246
2014 U.S. LEXIS 4169
82 U.S.L.W. 4489
24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 851
2014 WL 2675871

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the existence of a “substantial risk” that harm would occur was sufficient to confer Article III standing
holding that a plaintiff “should not be required to await and undergo a criminal prosecution as the sole means of seeking relief.”
holding that a pre-enforcement challenge is ripe where a party can articulate a “credible threat” that a statute will be enforced against him
holding that a pre-enforcement challenge is ripe where a party can articulate a “credible threat” that a statute will be enforced against him
holding that plaintiffs had standing where they “pleaded specific statements they intend to make in future election cycles,” and “there is a history of past enforcement”
holding that a claim was justiciable, even though the Court had not yet assessed its prudential ripeness, because “we have already concluded that .petitioners have alleged a sufficient Article III injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

410 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.