Skip to main content

Lewis v. State

Citations

  • 591 So. 2d 922
  • 1991 WL 256876

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s right to a full and fair defense was infringed where the victim’s consensual sexual relationship with a third person was relevant
  • finding that exclusion of evidence that complainant fabricated rape charges to hide her sexual relationship with her boyfriend from her mother violated the defendant’s constitutional right to confront his accuser and develop his defense through reasonable cross-examination
  • finding limitations on cross-examination \clearly unreasonable where ... they have the effect of precluding constitutionally adequate cross-examination\
  • finding limitations on cross-examination “clearly unreasonable where ... they have the effect of precluding constitutionally adequate cross-examination”
  • finding the Rape Shield Statute was expressly applicable only to prosecutions for sexual battery under § 794.011, Fla. Stat., until amended
  • acknowledging that in Marr the Court “explained that Florida’s Rape Shield Statute is a codification of the rule of relevancy that a victim’s prior sexual activity with one other than the accused is generally irrelevant for determining the guilt of the accused”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.