Supreme Court of Florida· 12/5/1991
Lewis v. State
Citations
- 591 So. 2d 922
- 1991 WL 256876
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant’s right to a full and fair defense was infringed where the victim’s consensual sexual relationship with a third person was relevant
- finding that exclusion of evidence that complainant fabricated rape charges to hide her sexual relationship with her boyfriend from her mother violated the defendant’s constitutional right to confront his accuser and develop his defense through reasonable cross-examination
- finding limitations on cross-examination \clearly unreasonable where ... they have the effect of precluding constitutionally adequate cross-examination\
- finding limitations on cross-examination “clearly unreasonable where ... they have the effect of precluding constitutionally adequate cross-examination”
- finding the Rape Shield Statute was expressly applicable only to prosecutions for sexual battery under § 794.011, Fla. Stat., until amended
- acknowledging that in Marr the Court “explained that Florida’s Rape Shield Statute is a codification of the rule of relevancy that a victim’s prior sexual activity with one other than the accused is generally irrelevant for determining the guilt of the accused”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kogan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court· 2006-11-30· cited 392×
- Lonnie K. Stephens v. Charles B. Miller, Warden, and Attorney General of the State of IndianaSeventh Circuit· 1994-01-06· cited 117×
- State v. PackedSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-07-18· cited 48×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2003-06-02· cited 41×
- Childers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-02· cited 27×
- Fluellen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-23· cited 18×
- McLean v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-05· cited 13×
- State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1999-12-30· cited 13×
- Roebuck v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-30· cited 11×
- Hammond v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-22· cited 11×
- CARLOS GOMEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-25· cited 7×
- Teemer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-09· cited 6×
- Baucham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-24· cited 6×
- Johnson v. MooreM.D. Florida· 2007-02-07· cited 6×
- Dixon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-02· cited 5×
- Collier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-10-18· cited 5×
- Children's Palace, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-07· cited 5×
- State v. AdderlyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-31· cited 5×
- Esteban v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-14· cited 4×
- State v. SnyderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-23· cited 4×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- Olden v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1988-12-12· cited 592×
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1987-07-02· cited 76×
- Marr v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-09-25· cited 27×
- Lewis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-21· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.