American Fed. of Govt. Employees v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the legislative history of the ADRA “suggests that Congress intended standing under the statute to be limited to disappointed bidders”
• holding that interested parties are those “prospective bidders or offerors whose direct economic interest would be affected by the award of the contract or by failure to award the contract”
• holding that an “interested party,” for purposes of § 1491(b)(1), is an “actual or prospective bidder[ ] or offeror[ ] whose direct economic interest would be affected by the award of the contract or by failure to award the contract”
• explaining that Congress conferred upon the Court of Federal Claims “jurisdiction previously exercised only by district courts under Scan-well”
• adopting the 35 definition of “interested party” from 31 U.S.C. § 3551(2), governing GAO protests
• \We ... construe the term 'interested party' in § 1491(b)(1) in accordance with the [Competition in Contracting Act] ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).