Andrews v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it was “not an abuse of discretion” to deny attorneys proceeding pro se “special consideration on the basis of their pro se status”
• concluding it was not an abuse of discretion to deny pro se practicing attorneys special consideration
• finding no abuse of discretion when magistrate judge denied pro se party’s order based on legal deficiency because party was a practicing attorney
• finding district court did not abuse its discretion by denying special consideration to pro se practicing attorneys
• “It was … not an abuse of discretion to deny [licensed attorneys] special consideration on the basis of their pro se status.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).