Pennington v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the substantive law of the forum state must be applied in diversity cases
• noting that the federal courts had “expended considerable time and resources addressing the question currently before us” when the appellants failed to request certification in the district court or before briefing was complete
• “The state court need not have addressed the exact question, so long as well-established principles exist to govern a decision.”
• “When we see a reasonably clear and principled course, we will seek to follow it ourselves.” (quoting Pino v. United States, 507 F.3d 1233, 1236 (10th Cir. 2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).