Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 6/26/1996
Leeks v. State
Citations
- 678 A.2d 80
- 110 Md. App. 543
- 1996 Md. App. LEXIS 96
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an on-the-record evidentiary hearing is necessary when the trial court “is asked to rule in limine that a witness cannot be asked questions” to show that he is biased, prejudiced, interested in the outcome of the proceeding, or has a motive to testify falsely
- noting that the issue was preserved for appellate review because the trial court ruled in limine to exclude evidence of a witness’ prior conviction for impeachment purposes even though no objection was made during trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Submitted Before Cathell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Peterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-07-27· cited 30×
- Calloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-06-10· cited 26×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-07-01· cited 20×
- Tharp v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-12-06· cited 14×
- Stouffer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-12-03· cited 12×
- Carrero-Vasquez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-21· cited 11×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-05-07· cited 7×
- Dionas v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-01· cited 7×
- Hall, Cummings, Lubin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-06-28· cited 6×
- Perez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-04-11· cited 5×
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2024-05-29· cited 4×
- Calloway v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-06-28
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2024-06-07
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. AbelSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,044×
- Danial Siebert v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1990-06-28· cited 310×
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-06-28· cited 107×
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-22· cited 89×
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-01-10· cited 87×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-12-07· cited 54×
- State v. BrobergCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-11· cited 52×
- Ebb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-02-14· cited 48×
- State v. DeLawderCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-09-23· cited 45×
- Kruszewski v. HolzCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-05-10· cited 40×
- Watkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-08· cited 40×
- Knox v. LanhamD. Maryland· 1995-07-31· cited 30×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-03-04· cited 23×
- Fletcher v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-12-08· cited 22×
- Gates v. KelleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1906-08-03· cited 17×
- Deinhardt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-12-05· cited 16×
- Waldron v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-05-08· cited 13×
- Johnson and Walters v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-03-03· cited 12×
- Yowell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-10-03· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.