Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 5/8/1985
Waldron v. State
Citations
- 491 A.2d 595
- 62 Md. App. 686
- 1985 Md. App. LEXIS 383
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowance of questions on cross-examination is normally reserved for the sound discretion of the trial judge and will not normally be disturbed absent an abuse if discretion
- in absence of proffer or “clear indication from [defense] counsel” sufficient to generate issue of witness bias, court did not err in foreclosing cross-examination of an important State’s witness concerning whether her expenses and housing were paid by the State in return for her testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-12-27· cited 97×
- Wooten-Bey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-03· cited 27×
- Leeks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-26· cited 20×
- Tharp v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-12-06· cited 14×
- Bloodsworth v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-07-08· cited 12×
- Stouffer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-12-03· cited 12×
- Jorgensen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-11-03· cited 9×
- Height v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-05-06· cited 9×
- In Re Matthew R.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-02-06· cited 9×
- Hopper v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-07-05· cited 9×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-07-01· cited 8×
- Kostelec v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-12-06· cited 3×
- Pettie v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-03-11· cited 3×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,939×
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,352×
- Von Lusch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-01-31· cited 92×
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-22· cited 89×
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1893-12-22· cited 88×
- Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-10-07· cited 80×
- Medley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-07-14· cited 48×
- State v. DeLawderCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-09-23· cited 45×
- Kruszewski v. HolzCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-05-10· cited 40×
- DeLilly v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-04-28· cited 34×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-07-09· cited 25×
- Fletcher v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-12-08· cited 22×
- Beckette v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-04-01· cited 17×
- Deinhardt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-12-05· cited 16×
- Johnson and Walters v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-03-03· cited 12×
- Rowe v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-04-09· cited 11×
- Godwin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-11-21· cited 10×
- Townsend v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-03-29· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.