Skip to main content

Lee v. State

Citations

  • 996 A.2d 425
  • 193 Md. App. 45
  • 2010 Md. App. LEXIS 93

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Maryland generally follows the common law rule, which allowed a third person to intervene and defend another using “the same degree and character of force that the one attacked could have used”
  • noting that the defendant “has the burden of initially producing some evidence on the issue of mitigation or self-defense (or relying upon evidence produced by the State) sufficient to give rise to a jury issue with respect to these defenses.”
  • “The defense of defense of others may not serve to justify or mitigate the use of deadly force when the person ostensibly being defended is not being attacked and is not even the target of a threatened attack.” (Emphasis supplied)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eyler, Deborah, Kehoe, Kenney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.