Lee v. Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is within the district court’s discretion to rule on a motion despite [movant]’s late filings.”
• “[E]qualization of the parties’ incomes by an adjustment of maintenance is without authority or precedent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Lee v. Lee
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-12-03· cited 64×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Marriage of Gully v. Gully
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-09-02· cited 72×
• Crosby v. Crosby
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-12-15· cited 39×
• In Re the Marriage of Richards
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-06-18· cited 25×
• Marriage of Frederiksen v. Frederiksen
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-06-04· cited 23×
• Marriage of Bliss v. Bliss
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-12-15· cited 21×
• Marriage of Gessner v. Gessner
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-08-18· cited 21×
• In Re LaBelle's Trust
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-11-08· cited 18×
• Reserve Mining Co. v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-09-25· cited 18×
• Marriage of Chamberlain v. Chamberlain
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-08-08· cited 18×
• St. Aubin v. Burke
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-01-17· cited 15×
• Marriage of Kruschel v. Kruschel
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-02-16· cited 15×
• Benassi v. Back & Neck Pain Clinic, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-07-10· cited 13×
• Walker v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-09-03· cited 7×
• Kemp v. Kemp
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-04-18· cited 5×
• Swenson v. Swenson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1960-03-11· cited 5×
• Gatfield v. Gatfield
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-07-06· cited 4×