Skip to main content
· 7/10/2001

Benassi v. Back & Neck Pain Clinic, Inc.

Citations

  • 629 N.W.2d 475
  • 2001 Minn. App. LEXIS 776
  • 2001 WL 766900

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Minnesota courts use the McDonnell Douglas framework to determine whether a violation of the MHRA has occurred.”
  • \The proper scope of inquiry on the issue of pretext is limited to whether the employer gave an honest explanation of its behavior.\
  • fault \should not be given legal significance\ in suits regarding return of engagement ring

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randall, Toussaint, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.