Ninth Circuit· 1/10/2002

Lee v. Katz

Citations

276 F.3d 550
2002 WL 24353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a private entity charged with regulating speech at a public forum was a “state actor” under the “public function” test when it was regulating such speech
holding that because an entity “performs an 15 exclusively and traditionally public function within a public forum, we focus only upon the public 16 function test”
noting that the Supreme Court in Brentwood “list[ed] seven approaches to the issue”
noting that the Supreme Court in Brentwood “list[ed] seven approaches to the issue”
recognizing “the fact-intensive nature of the 16 [state action] inquiry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graber, Tashima, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Lee v. Katz

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.