Citizens to End Animal Suffering & Exploitation, Inc. v. Faneuil Hall Marketplace, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the lanes in the Faneuil Hall Marketplace were public forums subject to the full protections of the First Amendment despite their being leased to a private enterprise
• holding that a private corporation's regulation of free speech activities on publicly owned land leased by the corporation was a public function, where that land was a public forum over which the public held an easement
• finding that the Marketplace was a public forum, in part because land was encumbered by an easement for public access and was indistinguishable from the surrounding public streets and sidewalks
• finding significant the fact that \[m]any pedestrians wholly uninterested in the Marketplace's offerings cross its lanes daily in traveling to the waterfront.\
• finding significant the fact that “[m]any pedestrians wholly uninterested in the Marketplace’s offerings cross its lanes daily in traveling to the waterfront.”
• finding symbiotic relationship where building was leased from city and challenged conduct occurred in access lanes “dedicated to public uses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).