· 6/19/2001
Curtis Freeman v. Allstate Life Insurance Company
Citations
- 253 F.3d 533
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 6221
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5049
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 13508
- 2001 WL 682398
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that error must be prejudicial to merit reversal
- finding where applicant had ailment for several years and was taking medication for it, she “must have realized” she had the condition
- upholding recission where misstatements were made in response to questions by telephone solicitor, telephone conversation was taped, and enrollment form confirmation was sent to insured
- affirming a district court decision in favor of insurer that rescinded life insurance based on a misrepresentation in the application that was discovered during contestable-period investigation
- findings of fact reviewed for clear error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwin, Hug, Fletcher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.