Skip to main content
· 6/19/2001

Curtis Freeman v. Allstate Life Insurance Company

Citations

  • 253 F.3d 533
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 6221
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5049
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 13508
  • 2001 WL 682398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that error must be prejudicial to merit reversal
  • finding where applicant had ailment for several years and was taking medication for it, she “must have realized” she had the condition
  • upholding recission where misstatements were made in response to questions by telephone solicitor, telephone conversation was taped, and enrollment form confirmation was sent to insured
  • affirming a district court decision in favor of insurer that rescinded life insurance based on a misrepresentation in the application that was discovered during contestable-period investigation
  • findings of fact reviewed for clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Hug, Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.