Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidentiary rulings made in the context of summary judgment are reviewed for an abuse of discretion
• holding that evidentiary rulings made in the context of summary judgment are reviewed for an abuse of discretion
• holding that the “Fremont Street Experience,” a publicly-owned commercial and entertainment pedestrian district in downtown Las Vegas, is a traditional public forum
• holding that a pedestrian street mall in Las Vegas was a traditional public forum
• denying motion to strike “ ‘new’ 13 arguments” raised in reply brief that “were a reasonable response to points made in the [opposing 14 party’s] answering brief”
• “The ability to restrict speech in public forums . . . is ‘sharply circum- scribed.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).