Skip to main content
· 8/26/2004

Leavings v. Mills

Citations

  • 175 S.W.3d 301
  • 54 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 678
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 7783
  • 2004 WL 1902536

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding further that the note was not even a negotiable instrument
  • party seeking to enforce note must show “unbroken chain of assignments” to the original mortgagee
  • “whether SMS is the owner of the note is a separate question which does not affect whether it is the holder of the note.”
  • “Since Mills has failed to show that he is either the owner or the holder of the note or of the trust deed, we hold that Mills has failed to establish his entitlement to summary judgment.”
  • litigation challenging putative assignee’s authority to foreclose initiated in 1997
  • litigation challenging putative assignee’s authority to foreclose initiated in 1997

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Evelyn v. Keyes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.