Kan v. ONEWEST BANK, FSB

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that attorney brought TDCA claim in bad faith because at “no point [did the plaintiff] make any effort to connect his factual allegations to a specific section of the [TDCA]”
• finding bad faith when plaintiff failed to make any effort to connect factual allegations to the statute
• dismissing suit for failure to state a claim where one of the arguments was that the mortgage documents were robosigned and therefore somehow invalid
• “For a complaint to meet the pleading requirements of Rule 8(a)(2) . . . the following conditions must be met: (1) every element of each cause of action must be supported by specific factual allegations; and (2) the complaint must state a plausible claim for relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).