Skip to main content
· 1/10/1991

Jernigan v. Bank One, Texas, NA

Citations

  • 803 S.W.2d 774
  • 15 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 516
  • 1991 Tex. App. LEXIS 88
  • 1991 WL 1510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • appellant’s bare allegation of ownership of note with gap and inconsistency in chain of title held insufficient to establish ownership as a matter of law
  • appellant’s bare allegation of ownership of note with gap and inconsistency in chain of title held insufficient to establish ownership as a matter of law
  • “possibility of an intermediate transfer” precludes judgment as a matter of law concerning bank’s capacity to sue on note

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson, Sears and Draughn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.