Skip to main content
· 3/14/2014

ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. v. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc.

Citations

  • 322 P.3d 114
  • 83 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 175
  • 2014 WL 995971
  • 2014 Alas. LEXIS 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing a decision to enlarge time to file for attorney’s fees under Rule 94 for abuse of discretion
  • reviewing a decision to enlarge time to file for attorney's fees under Rule 94 for abuse of discretion
  • \Whether the evidence presented a genuine issue of material fact is a question of law that we independently review.\ (quoting Kalenka v. Ja-don, Inc., 305 P.3d 346, 349 (Alaska 2013)) (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “Determinations of which legal authorities apply in a case and interpretations of what those legal authorities mean are questions of law subject to de novo review.” (footnotes omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Winfree, Stowers, Maassen, Bolger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.