Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. McGraw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Rule 3.7 of the Rules of Lawyer Disciplinary Procedure
• relying on Rule 3.7 of the Rules of Lawyer Disciplinary Procedure
• applying substantively identical Rule 1.6(a) of the West Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct and explaining that the rule “applies to all information relating to representation of a client, protecting more than just ‘confidences’ or ‘secrets’ of a client”
• “Rule 3.7 of the Rules of Lawyer Disciplinary Procedure ... requires the Office of Disciplinary Counsel to prove the allegations of the formal charge by clear and convincing evidence.”
• “Rule 3.7 of the Rules of Lawyer Disciplinary Procedure ... requires the Office of Disciplinary Counsel to prove the allegations of the formal charge by clear and convincing evidence.”
• “Rule 3.7 of the Rules of Lawyer Disciplinary Procedure ... requires the Office of Disciplinary Counsel to prove the allegations of the formal charge by clear and convincing evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).