Skip to main content

Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Scott

Citations

  • 579 S.E.2d 550
  • 213 W. Va. 209
  • 2003 W. Va. LEXIS 17

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the lawyer’s violation of Rules while holding public office was an aggravating factor
  • viewing inexperience as a mitigating factor but emphasizing that the attorney’s inexperience had nothing to do “with his pattern of lying and the falsification of documents”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, McGraw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.