Skip to main content
· 8/24/2007

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Siskind

Citations

  • 930 A.2d 328
  • 401 Md. 41
  • 2007 Md. LEXIS 492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “ ‘tactics involving dishonesty, fraud, or deceit, carry the risk of the ultimate sanction by this Court’ ”
  • noting that “we accept the hearing judge’s findings of fact as [prima facie] correct unless shown to be ‘clearly erroneous,’ and we give due regard to the hearing judge’s opportunity to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
  • attorney disbarred for dishonesty, fraud, and deceit toward a tribunal, in the absence of any mitigating factors
  • attorney disbarred for dishonesty, fraud, and deceit toward a tribunal, in the absence of any mitigating factors
  • attorney disbarred for dishonesty, fraud, and deceit toward a tribunal, in the absence of any mitigating factors
  • attorney disbarred for dishonesty, fraud, and deceit toward a tribunal, in the absence of any mitigating factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.