Skip to main content
· 1/3/1986

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tony Davis BALLARD, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 779 F.2d 287
  • 20 Fed. R. Serv. 109
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the crime-fraud exception applicable where the attorney refused to participate in intended illegality and so advised the defendant
  • showing of intentional delay for tactical purposes required for claim of violation of due process.
  • denying a Sixth Amendment speedy-trial claim because, among other things, the defendant had not “pointed to any lost evidence or witnesses with faded memories”
  • permitting an attorney to reveal otherwise privileged communications when defending himself against charges of improper conduct
  • “The privilege for communications between client and attorney ceases when the purpose of the privilege is abused, when the lawyer becomes either the accomplice or the unwitting tool in a continuing or planned wrongful act.”
  • “Notice pleading does not suffice for appellate briefs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gee, Rubin, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.