LaSala v. Needham & Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that courts have the inherent power to stay a case “pending the outcome of proceedings which bear upon the case”
• noting that a court is firmly within its discretion, in the interest of judicial economy, to enter a stay pending the outcome of proceedings which bear upon the case, even if such proceedings are not necessarily controlling of the action that is to be stayed
• noting that a court is firmly within its discretion, in the interest of judicial economy, to enter a stay pending the outcome of proceedings which bear upon the case, even if such proceedings are not necessarily controlling of the action that is to be stayed
• granting stay when the stay did “not delay the [claims] indefinitely”
• noting the propriety of staying a lawsuit “in light of a concurrently pending federal action (either because the claim arises from the same nucleus of facts or because the pending action would resolve a controlling point of law)” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “[W]here a higher court is close to settling an issue of law bearing on the action,” a stay is favored.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
  S.D. New York· 2009-04-29· cited 59×
• Russian Standard Vodka (USA), Inc. v. Allied Domecq Spirits & Wine USA, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2007-11-20· cited 14×
• LaSala v. Needham & Co., Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2005-10-11· cited 3×
• Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. DiPizio Construction Co.
  W.D. New York· 2015-05-07· cited 1×
• Lasala Ex Rel. Conextant, Inc. v. ETrade Securities LLC
  S.D. New York· 2006-02-27

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Landis v. North American Co.
  Supreme Court· 1936-12-07· cited 5,442×
• Clinton v. Jones
  Supreme Court· 1997-05-27· cited 2,415×
• Antonio R. Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.
  Ninth Circuit· 1979-03-19· cited 585×
• Cooper v. Parsky
  Second Circuit· 1998-04-02· cited 340×
• Golden Pacific Bancorp, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee
  Second Circuit· 2001-12-07· cited 264×
• In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2003-02-19· cited 193×
• Worldcrisa Corporation and Crisa Corporation v. Patrick J. Armstrong
  Second Circuit· 1997-10-16· cited 186×
• Kashi v. Gratsos
  Second Circuit· 1986-05-15· cited 150×
• Volmar Distributors, Inc. v. New York Post Co., Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1993-12-14· cited 115×
• Kappel v. Comfort
  S.D. New York· 1996-02-15· cited 104×
• Arden Way Associates v. Boesky
  S.D. New York· 1987-05-26· cited 43×
• Bano v. Union Carbide Corp.
  Second Circuit· 2001-11-15· cited 43×
• SST GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY, LLC v. Chapman
  S.D. New York· 2003-07-14· cited 41×
• Hisler v. Gallaudet University
  District of Columbia· 2004-10-21· cited 38×
• Ken-N.K., Inc. v. Vernon Township
  Sixth Circuit· 2001-08-23· cited 38×
• American Shipping Line, Inc. v. Massan Shipping Industries, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1995-01-30· cited 34×
• Klein v. Adams & Peck
  Second Circuit· 1971-01-04· cited 32×
• Goldstein v. Time Warner New York City Cable Group
  S.D. New York· 1998-04-24· cited 25×
• McDonald v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1986-01-06· cited 20×
• In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2005-02-15· cited 19×

Other cases named LaSala v. Needham & Co., Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• LaSala v. Needham & Co., Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2005-10-11· cited 3×