Golden Pacific Bancorp, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that unjust enrichment claims premised on fiduciary breach obtained benefit of fiduciary tolling rule
• holding that Government’s contract and unjust enrichment claims accrued as of date of submission of claims
• holding that under New York law, for a successful claim of unjust enrichment, the plaintiff must establish, inter alia , that the defendant was enriched
• holding that New York’s six-year statute of limitations generally applies for claims of unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duty
• applying New York law and reversing the district court’s grant of summary judgment on basis that contract language did not create an unambiguous release
• finding 34 that a release of claims “arising from or with respect to the decision of the [party] to close the Bank on June 21, 1985” did not constitute an unambiguous general release

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).