Antonio R. Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that 15 “the Fair Labor Standards Act claim in count I of the complaint is not arbitrable” and therefore 16 “the defendant was not entitled to a stay pursuant to section 3 of the Arbitration Act”
• “[a] stay should not be granted unless it appears likely the other proceedings will be concluded within a reasonable time.”
• “A trial court may, with propriety, find it is efficient for its own docket and the 8 fairest course for the parties to enter a stay of an action before it, pending resolution of 9 independent proceedings which bear upon the case.”
• “A trial court may, 22 with propriety, find it is efficient for its own docket and the fairest course for the parties to 23 enter a stay of an action before it, pending resolution of independent proceedings which 24 bear upon the case.”
• “A trial court may, with propriety, find it is efficient 17 for its own docket and the fairest course for the parties to 18 enter a stay of an action before it, pending resolution of 19 independent proceedings which bear upon the case.”
• “A trial court may, with 14 propriety, find it is efficient for its own docket and the fairest course for the parties to enter 15 a stay of an action before it, pending resolution of independent proceedings which bear 16 upon the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).