S.D. New York· 7/14/2003
SST GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY, LLC v. Chapman
Citations
- 270 F. Supp. 2d 444
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11946
- 2003 WL 21646325
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that motions “to stay proceedings in a federal action based on the existence of a concurrently pending state civil action . . . [are] governed by the principles of federal abstention doctrine”
- noting that the five-factor test “has been applied to stay a federal action in light of a concurrently pending federal action (either because the claim arises from the same nucleus of facts or because the pending action would resolve a controlling point of law)”
- “A related aspect of piecemeal litigation ... is whether resolution in one forum will resolve the claims as to all parties.”
- abstention argument rejected where defendants claimed that “adjudication in Delaware will substantially resolve even the asserted federal securities claim by resolving the underlying factual issues which allegedly support it”
- “The language referring to where ‘any act or transaction constituting the violation occurred,’ has been held to apply to civil cases.” (citing Grossman v. Young, 70 F. Supp. 970 (S.D.N.Y. 1947)
- “The language referring to where ‘any act or transaction constituting the violation occurred,’ has been held to apply to civil cases.” (citing Grossman v. Young, 70 F. Supp. 970 (S.D.N.Y. 1947)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haight
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLCS.D. New York· 2006-07-20· cited 110×
- LaSala v. Needham & Co., Inc.S.D. New York· 2005-08-30· cited 71×
- Mazuma Holding Corp. v. BethkeE.D. New York· 2014-03-03· cited 41×
- In Touch Concepts, Inc. v. Cellco PartnershipS.D. New York· 2013-06-04· cited 27×
- Digitalb, SH.A v. Setplex, LLCS.D. Illinois· 2018-01-11· cited 26×
- Frydman v. VerschleiserS.D. New York· 2016-03-22· cited 23×
- Pike Co. v. Universal Concrete Prods., Inc.W.D. New York· 2018-01-08· cited 16×
- Wayne County Employees' Retirement System v. MGIC Investment Corp.E.D. Michigan· 2009-03-10· cited 14×
- Kingsway Financial Services, Inc. v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLP.S.D. New York· 2005-11-30· cited 12×
- Catholic Order of Foresters v. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc.N.D. Iowa· 2004-09-27· cited 11×
- United States v. Town of Oyster BayE.D. New York· 2014-12-05· cited 11×
- Levin v. HSBC Bank, N.A.E.D. New York· 2015-04-09· cited 11×
- Krieger v. Atheros Communications, Inc.N.D. California· 2011-03-04· cited 8×
- Blackrock Balanced Capital Portfolio v. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'nS.D. New York· 2015-03-31· cited 7×
- Giles v. ICG, INC.S.D. West Virginia· 2011-05-27· cited 5×
- Mar-Cone Appliance Parts Co. v. ManganW.D. New York· 2012-07-20· cited 5×
- Erbey Holding Corporation John R. Erbey Family Limited Partnership v. Blackrock Financial Management, Inc.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands· 2023-12-04
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 9,657×
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-24· cited 6,491×
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court· 1997-12-15· cited 6,055×
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1922-11-20· cited 1,012×
- Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc.Second Circuit· 1998-04-03· cited 202×
- U.S. Titan, Inc. v. Guangzhou Zhen Hua Shipping Co., Ltd.Second Circuit· 2001-02-15· cited 144×
- Bethlehem Contracting Co. v. Lehrer/McGovern, Inc.Second Circuit· 1986-09-15· cited 119×
- Marisol A. by Next Friend Forbes v. GiulianiS.D. New York· 1996-06-18· cited 117×
- Volmar Distributors, Inc. v. New York Post Co., Inc.S.D. New York· 1993-12-14· cited 115×
- Hays County Guardian v. Jerome K. SuppleFifth Circuit· 1992-09-04· cited 105×
- Kappel v. ComfortS.D. New York· 1996-02-15· cited 104×
- Wyndham Associates v. BintliffSecond Circuit· 1968-06-26· cited 98×
- Ganino v. Citizens Utilities Co.Second Circuit· 2000-09-11· cited 93×
- Fort Howard Paper Co. v. William D. Witter, Inc.Second Circuit· 1986-03-27· cited 78×
- Riley v. SimmonsThird Circuit· 1995-03-16· cited 60×
- Zorn v. AndersonS.D. New York· 1966-12-05· cited 57×
- Neufeld v. NeufeldS.D. New York· 1996-01-23· cited 49×
- Padilla v. City of SaginawE.D. Michigan· 1994-11-15· cited 47×
- Caspian Investments, Ltd. v. Vicom Holdings, Ltd.S.D. New York· 1991-07-31· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.