Larian v. Momentus Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that interpretive rules \only explain what the more general terms of the Act and regulations already provide\
• noting that interpretive rules \do not change any existing law or policy nor do these provisions remove any previously existing rights\
• finding Social Security claims manual did not need to fulfill the general APA requirement for public notice and comment
• rule was interpretive because \[t]hese provisions only explain what the more general terms of the Act and regulations already provide\
• rule was interpretive because “[tjhese provisions only explain what the more general terms of the Act and regulations already provide”
• “[Mjandamus jurisdiction is proper to vindicate an interest in procedural regularity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).