Skip to main content
· 3/25/2010

Estate of Osborn Ex Rel. Osborn v. Kemp

Citations

  • 991 A.2d 1153
  • 2010 Del. LEXIS 135
  • 2010 WL 1112373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party seeking specific performance must demonstrate, inter alia, that she “is ready, willing and able to perform”
  • holding that courts must give each term of a contract effect so as not to render any part of the contract extraneous
  • holding that “[a] party must prove by clear and convincing evidence that he or she is entitled to specific performance . . . .”
  • holding that contracts must be read “as a whole” to “give each provision and term effect, so as not to render any part of the contract mere surplusage”
  • holding that specific performance was the most equitable remedy after a lessee lived in a property for 20 years, made improvements, and signed a holographic real estate sales contract
  • holding that courts must “read a contract as a whole and . . . give each provision and term effect, so as not to render any part of the contract mere surplusage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Berger, Ridgely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.