· 10/1/1969
Cross v. Hair
Citations
- 258 A.2d 277
- 1969 Del. LEXIS 207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a decision that finds that a case “is not one to be disposed of summarily and is one for trial” does not constitute an adjudication of a legal right supporting an appeal of such decision
- “Under the rule now well established in this jurisdiction, there is no ‘right’ to a summary judgment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wolcott, Carey, Herrmann
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.