Skip to main content
· 10/1/1969

Cross v. Hair

Citations

  • 258 A.2d 277
  • 1969 Del. LEXIS 207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a decision that finds that a case “is not one to be disposed of summarily and is one for trial” does not constitute an adjudication of a legal right supporting an appeal of such decision
  • “Under the rule now well established in this jurisdiction, there is no ‘right’ to a summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolcott, Carey, Herrmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.