Skip to main content
· 5/10/2010

Axis Reinsurance Co. v. Hlth Corp.

Citations

  • 993 A.2d 1057
  • 2010 WL 1610623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Delaware courts read contracts in a way “that is reasonable and harmonizes the affected contract provisions”
  • holding prior acts exclusion in insurance contract barred coverage
  • “[A] court will not adopt [an] interpretation that leads to unreasonable results, but instead will adopt the construction that is reasonable and that harmonizes the affected contract provisions.”
  • “[A] court will not adopt [an] interpretation that leads to unreasonable results, but instead will adopt [a] construction that is reasonable and that harmonizes the affected contract provisions.”
  • “[A] court will not adopt [an] interpretation that leads to unreasonable results, but instead will adopt the construction that is reasonable and that harmonizes the affected contract provisions.”
  • “[A] court will not adopt [an] interpretation that leads to unreasonable results, but instead will adopt [a] construction that is reasonable and that harmonizes the affected contract provisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Holland, Jacobs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.