· 5/10/2010
Axis Reinsurance Co. v. Hlth Corp.
Citations
- 993 A.2d 1057
- 2010 WL 1610623
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that Delaware courts read contracts in a way “that is reasonable and harmonizes the affected contract provisions”
- holding prior acts exclusion in insurance contract barred coverage
- “[A] court will not adopt [an] interpretation that leads to unreasonable results, but instead will adopt the construction that is reasonable and that harmonizes the affected contract provisions.”
- “[A] court will not adopt [an] interpretation that leads to unreasonable results, but instead will adopt [a] construction that is reasonable and that harmonizes the affected contract provisions.”
- “[A] court will not adopt [an] interpretation that leads to unreasonable results, but instead will adopt the construction that is reasonable and that harmonizes the affected contract provisions.”
- “[A] court will not adopt [an] interpretation that leads to unreasonable results, but instead will adopt [a] construction that is reasonable and that harmonizes the affected contract provisions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steele, Holland, Jacobs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.