Supreme Court· 5/20/1991
Lankford v. Idaho
Citations
- 500 U.S. 110
- 111 S. Ct. 1723
- 114 L. Ed. 2d 173
- 1991 U.S. LEXIS 2786
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant must have notice that the trial court might sentence him to death
- holding that adequate notice to seek death penalty is required under Due Process Clause for the State to seek a death sentence
- holding that a defendant must have notice that the trial court might sentence him to death
- holding that the defendant’s due process rights to notice were violated when a judge imposed a capital sentence even though the State took the position that it would not seek the death penalty
- holding that the defendant’s due process rights to notice were violated when a judge imposed a capital sentence even though the State took the position that it would not seek the death penalty
- holding that the defendant’s due process rights to notice were violated when a judge imposed a capital sentence even though the State took the position that it would not seek the death penalty
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevens, Marshall, Blackmun, O'Connor, Kennedy, Scalia, Rehnquist, White, Souter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Lankford v. Idaho
8 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 9×
- Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court· 1988-06-13
- Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court· 1989-05-11
- Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court· 1989-05-11
- Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court· 1989-11-20
- Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court· 1989-11-20
- Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court· 1990-10-15
- Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court· 1990-10-15
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.