Supreme Court· 1/11/1864
Baldwin v. Hale
Citations
- 68 U.S. 223
- 17 L. Ed. 531
- 1 Wall. 223
- 1863 U.S. LEXIS 454
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Common justice requires that no man shall be condemned in his person or property without notice and an opportunity to make his defence\
- “Common justice requires that no man shall be condemned in his person or property without notice and an opportunity to make his de-fence”
- \[c]ommon justice requires that no man shall be condemned in his person or property without notice and an opportunity to make his defense\
- ‘‘[c]ommon justice requires that no man shall be condemned in his person or property without notice and an opportunity to make his defense”
- \Common justice requires that no man shall be condemned in his person or property without notice and an opportunity to make his defense\
- “Common justice requires that no man shall be condemned in his person or property without notice and an opportunity to make his defense”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clifford, After Stating the Case
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
177 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 3,921×
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 3,215×
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 3,052×
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court· 1975-01-22· cited 3,014×
- Wilkinson v. AustinSupreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 2,479×
- Gray v. NetherlandSupreme Court· 1996-06-20· cited 1,588×
- Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 1,441×
- Officer Melissa Kallstrom v. City of ColumbusSixth Circuit· 1998-02-12· cited 452×
- Ex Parte MaddingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-03-06· cited 421×
- Atkins v. ParkerSupreme Court· 1985-06-04· cited 377×
- Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court· 1890-01-20· cited 339×
- Avant v. CliffordSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-06-23· cited 276×
- Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.D. New Jersey· 1987-11-05· cited 275×
- International Shoe Co. v. PinkusSupreme Court· 1929-01-02· cited 222×
- Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 205×
- Canada Southern Railway Co. v. GebhardSupreme Court· 1883-12-17· cited 189×
- Gladstone v. Bartlesville Independent School District No. 30Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2003-03-18· cited 159×
- Brown v. McLennan County Children's Protective ServicesTexas Supreme Court· 1982-01-27· cited 153×
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court· 1987-10-05· cited 151×
- State v. DunsterNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-08-03· cited 120×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Baldwin v. Hale
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.