California Supreme Court· 7/17/2003
People v. Yeoman
Citations
- 72 P.3d 1166
- 2 Cal. Rptr. 3d 186
- 31 Cal. 4th 93
- 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6313
- 2003 Daily Journal DAR 7888
- 2003 Cal. LEXIS 4823
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- appellate court need not examine merits of the defendant’s claims of error if the defendant cannot show prejudice
- \To use a suspect's image in successive lineups might be suggestive if the same photograph were reused or if the lineups followed each other quickly enough for the witness to retain a distinct memory of the prior lineup.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Werdegar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
198 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-01-31· cited 1,280×
- People v. PartidaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-11-21· cited 971×
- People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-10-27· cited 855×
- The People v. MaiCalifornia Supreme Court· 2013-08-26· cited 818×
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court· 2011-08-29· cited 774×
- People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-05-15· cited 744×
- People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-08-21· cited 743×
- People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2009-06-15· cited 681×
- People v. FuiavaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2012-02-06· cited 648×
- People v. TullyCalifornia Supreme Court· 2012-07-30· cited 629×
- People v. PanahCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-03-14· cited 604×
- People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-03-02· cited 560×
- People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2011-08-22· cited 543×
- People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-05-11· cited 536×
- People v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 527×
- People v. RundleCalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-04-03· cited 524×
- People v. DykesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2009-06-15· cited 513×
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-07-28· cited 496×
- The People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2013-08-26· cited 479×
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2010-05-24· cited 457×
Cites
140 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 3,922×
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 3,458×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1985-06-11· cited 2,827×
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-06-09· cited 2,651×
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 2,410×
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,209×
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,080×
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 2,053×
- McCleskey v. KempSupreme Court· 1987-06-08· cited 2,038×
Other cases named People v. Yeoman
6 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- People v. YeomanMichigan Court of Appeals· 1996-10-15· cited 37×
- People v. YeomanAppellate Court of Illinois· 2016-09-16· cited 13×
- People v. YeomanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-04-19· cited 9×
- People v. YeomanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-04-19
- People v. YeomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2025-04-25
- People v. YeomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2025-04-25
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.