Lampkin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that “the State must demonstrate a sufficient connection or similarity between the independent offense or act and the crime charged so that proof of the former tends to prove the latter” before the independent offense or act can be introduced to prove identity
• emphasizing that “the State must demonstrate a sufficient connection or similarity between the independent offense or act and the crime charged so that proof of the former tends to prove the latter” before the independent offense or act can be introduced to prove identity
• state must demonstrate sufficient connection or similarity between independent offense and crime charged so that proof of former tends to prove latter
• In order for a similar transaction to be admissible, “the State must demonstrate a sufficient connection or similarity between the independent offense or act and the crime charged so that proof of the former tends to prove the latter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hill v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-07-02· cited 16×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-11-25· cited 8×
• Walker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-06-22· cited 8×
• Dixon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-11· cited 4×
• Eric Lamont Dixon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-11

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-11-01· cited 827×
• Booker v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-01-04· cited 14×
• Hefner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-02-12· cited 9×
• Rice v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-05-18· cited 8×
• Card v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-05-02· cited 5×