Court of Appeals of Georgia· 5/2/2005
Card v. State
Citations
- 615 S.E.2d 139
- 273 Ga. App. 367
- 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1445
- 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 427
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no ineffective assistance of counsel based on failure to object to admissible similar transaction evidence
- “We will reverse a trial court’s decision to admit evidence of a similar transaction only if the court has abused its discretion.”
- defendant’s failure to reveal a witness to his attorney or to the court until a few days before trial commenced supported the exclusion of the witness’s testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barnes, Ruffin, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Huckabee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-07-05· cited 21×
- Grier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-10-20· cited 19×
- McDaniel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-02-22· cited 12×
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-01-25· cited 7×
- Lampkin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-01-17· cited 5×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1991-11-01· cited 827×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-04-23· cited 75×
- Maggard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1989-06-22· cited 57×
- Mangham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-09-29· cited 24×
- Sims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-04-07· cited 20×
- Mika v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-07-16· cited 13×
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-07-27· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.