Hefner v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Absolute proof is not required that a defendant committed the offense in a similar transaction. What is required is that there be evidence that the defendant was the perpetrator of the independent crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Herndon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-11-18· cited 21×
• Rary v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-09-08· cited 14×
• Chisholm v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-09-08· cited 11×
• Slaughter v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-07-08· cited 10×
• Clemons v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-02-05· cited 8×
• Lampkin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-01-17· cited 5×
• Burks v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-07-29

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-11-01· cited 827×
• Ladson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1981-11-13· cited 70×
• Patterson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-11-26· cited 37×
• Norris v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-01-22· cited 29×
• Miller v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-12-01· cited 13×
• Gunter v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-11-22· cited 12×
• Ryles v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-03-01· cited 3×