Skip to main content

Lake v. Putnam

Citations

  • 316 Mich. App. 247
  • 894 N.W.2d 62

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • SHAPIRO, J., 11 Pueblo did not raise an argument grounded in Michigan’s Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses. 19 concurring
  • “While we acknowledge that the issue presented in this case is complex, we simply do not believe it is within courts’ discretion to, at the request of one party and in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. [644] (2015

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meter, Shapiro, O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.